Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 I googled PL 87-297 after a friend showed it to me,,,,,very disturbing,,,,,,especially in that it hasn't been thrown out.... CPBC http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/un/do.htm Link to comment
Tell Sackett SASS 18436 Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Whatever that creep signed does not override the Constitution. Link to comment
Hacker, SASS #55963 Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Some of these old yet still present (if we can believe what is linked in the OP) need to be cleaned out along with a bunch of bad case law and ignorant/incompetent scotus work. Not to mention presidential orders and bad law passed by congress. Spring cleaning? Link to comment
G #1840 Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 The links do not appear to point to anything remotely like what was presented. The document linked at the bottom looks like the John Birch Society stuff from the 60s Link to comment
Wolfpack Jack Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 I followed the link to the site, every time I clicked on one of the links to the supposed law, I ended up on some page called FindLaw which is trying to sell something. Link to comment
Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted March 14, 2013 Author Share Posted March 14, 2013 I followed the link to the site, every time I clicked on one of the links to the supposed law, I ended up on some page called FindLaw which is trying to sell something. then just search pl 87-297 you'll have a choice.. cpbc Link to comment
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Hi Folks, I prefer to go to the source, in this case the US Government. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-75/pdf/STATUTE-75-Pg631.pdf Regards, Allie Mo Link to comment
Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 It doesn't bother me, because I don't pay any Federal income tax anyway, because the income tax is unconstitutional, because Ohio was never properly made a state in the first place. So the so-called "public laws" don't apply. You could look it up. Link to comment
G #1840 Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 I read Allie's linked document and found NO reference to the things mentioned in the OP. It seems to be an order to allow negotiations on disarmament and the structure for the negotiations. A word search did not find United Nations, Soviet, Russian anywhere in the doc. Link to comment
Stoneburner Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I read Allie's linked document and found NO reference to the things mentioned in the OP. It seems to be an order to allow negotiations on disarmament and the structure for the negotiations. A word search did not find United Nations, Soviet, Russian anywhere in the doc. I agree. I have not had a chance to look at this in-depth (I also downloaded it directly from the government), but a cursory examination leads me to believe it is about disarmament and arms control as they relate to nuclear weapons, NOT personal firearms. If we consider the historical context, nuclear weapons were at the front of everyone's mind at the time, but if this law was really about private firearms, then the assassination of JFK would have given LBJ the perfect rationale for seizure of personal weapons. I think bringing up laws like this for our fellow shooters to look at is a great idea. We're all understandably jittery about any law that is seemingly anti-gun, but we can also show that we are responsible citizens and look at things carefully before raising the general alarm. Link to comment
Utah Bob #35998 Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I am not concerned. In my opinion this just distracts folks from the more immediate threat of our state and Federal legislatures. Link to comment
Guest Texas Jack Black Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Sky falling again, I hope you all know the looney leftys are loving all this. :wacko: Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.