Utah Bob #35998 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 They actually put it in the bill. Then removed it when they got caught, calling it a mistake! BS! An assault on the 2nd and the 4th now! http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020373291_westneat17xml.html Link to comment
Six-Shot Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 They actually put it in the bill. Then removed it when they got caught, calling it a mistake! BS! An assault on the 2nd and the 4th now! http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020373291_westneat17xml.html Good catch! "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance" Link to comment
Hacker, SASS #55963 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I am glad they caught em this time. I wonder how many other bills submitted have similar garbage. Link to comment
Utah Bob #35998 Posted February 19, 2013 Author Share Posted February 19, 2013 This is the language that was in the original bill before they got caught and removed it. “In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.” Link to comment
Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 They actually put it in the bill. Then removed it when they got caught, calling it a mistake! BS! An assault on the 2nd and the 4th now! http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020373291_westneat17xml.html An example of 'Guess we got to pass it to see what's in it...' ...nice try legislators. GG Link to comment
John E. Law Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 That lawmakers sponsor bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s disappointing on one of this political magnitude. Not counting a long table, it’s only an eight-page bill. OMG!?!?!? JEL Link to comment
Madd Mike #8595 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 They actually put it in the bill. Then removed it when they got caught, calling it a mistake! BS! An assault on the 2nd and the 4th now! http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020373291_westneat17xml.html I heard that on rush today the supporters state that they did NOT read the bill bull spit they were hoping no one else would read the bill just imagine, the local law, with the right to enter you home once a year just to see if guns are stored properly and if not you can get 1 year in jail with bubba as your room mate http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/19/democrats-gun-bill-lets-washington-state-sheriffs-/ Link to comment
Guest Texas Jack Black Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 That would have violated the 4th amendment .Waste of time talking about .Never would have happened. Link to comment
Utah Bob #35998 Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 That would have violated the 4th amendment .Waste of time talking about .Never would have happened.The point is what they Tried to do. That's what is worth talking about.Many of the pending bills around the country violate the 2nd amendment. But we can't say "They won't happen so they're not worth talking about" can we? Link to comment
Madd Mike #8595 Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 That would have violated the 4th amendment .Waste of time talking about .Never would have happened. not if folks just let them in just because they are under informed folks i was born and raised in washington state, they are as blue as you can get sorry to waste your time LOL edit TJB, I sometimes think that you are missing something the current admin, at all levels are trashing several / many, or our amendment rights with the help of under informed voters its about giging us, we spend $$$$$$$$$$$ proving our amendment rights or many roll over, and just let those rights go buy - by Link to comment
Virgil Ray Hality, SASS# 37355 Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 Stay vigilant Pards! Link to comment
Hacker, SASS #55963 Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 Guys, the whole point is that regardless of what the Constitution and the Bill of Rights say the executive branch (should call it a weed sometimes) has been attempting to find ways around it for many years. Most if not all of the BOR Amendments have seriously been compromised either by federal law that the scotus is too weak to overrule or by scotus defining exceptions. This administration has gotten bolder since who knows what reason. And will continue this push to undermine the Constitution and the BOR. Nothing seriously new here. Moreover EACH branch of the government has been attempting to undermine the authority of the others. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.