Dusty Balz, SASS#46599 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 After reading the headlines about the US soldier who shot up Afghanistan Civilians, cant help noticing an irony. There is all this clamor to Try this guy quickly and execute him, never mind his having suffered a Traumatic brain injury. Yet this Major Hasan, who shot up Fort Hood While screaming Allah akbar, still hasnt stood trial, and they are Still debating whether he was insane, even with the clear evidence Regarding his motive: slay as many infidels as possible. So we have a Guy in a war zone who cracks, and he must be executed immediately. But This Muslim psychiatrist who was stateside in a nice safe office all day Murders 13, wounds 29 of our own guys, and they try to argue the poor Lad suffered post-traumatic stress syndrome, from listening to real Soldiers who had actual battle experience. Two and a half years later, they still havent tried the murderous bastard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Both instinces were bad no doubt, but I am with ya on this Dusty! GG ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hangfire SASS #24379 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 And on a related note, where are the calls for justice for the NATO servicemen getting shot by their supposed allies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Mountain Charlie SASS #43172 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 The whole mess smells of dead three day old fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Hawk 60642 Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 Both instinces were bad no doubt, but I am with ya on this Dusty! GG ~ +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.D.Ironsmith Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 If we don't protect our own servicemen,on our own soil, from being preyed upon by a commissioned officer...for whatever reason... we might as well just call it quits... we are not the Country we should be... More or less we have in one situation a commissioned officer, who, with substantial premeditation, committed a treasonous act, taking the lives of U.S.servicemen (at a time he knew they would be unarmed) and in the other, a NCO, who snapped in combat and took the lives of those he perceived as his enemy... That this Country even engages in discussion as to which is the more severe crime is frustrating... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 You'll always find a contradiction if you want to make one up. It'll take years for both of 'em, and for exactly the same reasons. What's the point, exactly? I'd say both are about as bad as it gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hacker, SASS #55963 Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 They have to make up the facts to suit their agenda ? Each case is very simple. the major who killed US soldiers at a stateside base, gets hung/shot/gassed/injected etc. the sergent who suffered a PTSD gets sent to a medical facility specializing in head injuries for continuing treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.