Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Sig Sauer 1911 and the P226


Aunt Jen

Recommended Posts

Here is my new Sig: /Users/noname/Pictures/1911a.JPG I'm eager to have it.

 

I know it's an apples/oranges thing, but why do some people consider the P226 better?

 

For historical connection, I prefer the 1911. And I have a Glock 17 for the more modern...., though the Sig is so good, I don't know if that matters. On my Glock, I don't have a jamming problem. I stiff-wrist it, anyway, to help bring it back on target for double-tap. It'll rock and roll.

 

I'll get the 1911 in 10+ days, and then Painless and I will have to go test it and see how it does. I'm expecting it'll be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jen,

I want you to know that it is YOUR fault that I have the fever for a Sig 1911. I was content and thinking of getting a Colt as I wanted one that says "100 years of service" on it and then your post the other day got me hooked on a Sig instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jen,

I want you to know that it is YOUR fault that I have the fever for a Sig 1911. I was content and thinking of getting a Colt as I wanted one that says "100 years of service" on it and then your post the other day got me hooked on a Sig instead.

Oh, how nice. I haven't shot one yet. I did the paperwork for mine today (bought it the other day), and it feels good. Looks solid. I do get the impression it's a nice piece. And I'm sure it is. I'll report later. I really have only shot one, some 30 years ago? So I don't really know enough about the different makes to compare. I'm guessing a cheaper one would be great, too, but then—knowing me—I'd tinker with it to slick it and I'd wind up with more in it than the Sig, anyway. So I got it. It seems to have on it what I'd want.

 

Boss?

 

You look like John Wayne. :wub: They don't make 'em much finer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is for sure-

I figger anyone says the 226 is better (GREAT gun BTW) is jest NOT a 1911 fan?

seems to me the 1911 is better, the 226 is fatter(hindering those with small hands getting a good grip), only a 9, and plus ever since my buddy got killed using one I could never own one without thinking of him. The criminal had a baretta and he had 226 and they killed each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry.

no, sorry it came back to mind again. sorry I hijacked your post a little. back to your qestion, the only advantage I can see the 226 has is it is double action and some do not feel comfortable carrying a 1911 cocked with a round in the chamber and locked like it should be. that hammer being back makes them nervous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve got 4 1911’s and only one Sig P226. The Sig lives in the bottom of the safe the 1911’s are where I can reach them if needed. When working if it looked like the excrement was going to hit the whirling blades I reached for the Gold Cup every time, and I am a factory trained Sig armorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, sorry it came back to mind again. sorry I hijacked your post a little. back to your qestion, the only advantage I can see the 226 has is it is double action and some do not feel comfortable carrying a 1911 cocked with a round in the chamber and locked like it should be. that hammer being back makes them nervous.

Hmmmmm....

 

Yes, I can see that. But having one chambered in a double-action seems to me to have a similar risk, as it's a minor difference in the trigger... Usually there is some kind of safety (trigger, grip, lever).

 

For SD, one needs to be ready quickly. If anything's not chambered, then I hope one has time to chamber...

 

If one has a round chambered, then you'd still have to remove the safety (if there is a lever), grip the gun (which removes another safety, if so equipped), and pull the trigger, which seems to be about the same thing you'd have to do for a double-action pull.

 

It's a different system, but I don't see it as being less safe, per se, to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmmm....

 

Yes, I can see that. But having one chambered in a double-action seems to me to have a similar risk, as it's a minor difference in the trigger... Usually there is some kind of safety (trigger, grip, lever).

 

For SD, one needs to be ready quickly. If anything's not chambered, then I hope one has time to chamber...

 

If one has a round chambered, then you'd still have to remove the safety (if there is a lever), grip the gun (which removes another safety, if so equipped), and pull the trigger, which seems to be about the same thing you'd have to do for a double-action pull.

 

It's a different system, but I don't see it as being less safe, per se, to me.

 

Apples & Oranges.

 

I prefer the 1911. It's the apple of my eye. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 226 I would really like to sell so I can get another 1911.

 

That P-228 is a fantastic pistol, but I just shoot better with the 1911.

 

My son was torn up recently on which pistol to buy and narrowed it down to the SIG or a Kimber. Ended up with the Kimber. I would really like the opportunity to shoot the SIG variety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have carried both weapons as a LEO. As an Officer, the 226 has more ammo capasity. You have 45 rounds with 2 extra mags. The 1911 has about 22 round with 2 extra mags. I like both to shoot and carry. It just depends on whether you want more ammo with the 226 or more knockdown with 1911.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.