Who is writing a rebuttal to J. P. Lower's article?

[Guest Paniolo Cowboy SASS #75875]

Without hijacking the other thread, I'm curious.

 

Is anyone going to send in a rebuttal to J. P. Lower's article?

 

The other thread went for 6 pages before it got hijacked by a Spelling Nazi,

and now it seemed that after a lot of post by many offended people

it never answered the question if anyone was angry enough

to send something into the CC as a rebuttal?

 

Will there be a CC rebuttal?

[Capt. Morgan Rum, SASS #6859]

Sounds to me like you have volunteered!

[J-BAR #18287]

OK, here's the rebuttal letter:

 

Dear Tex:

 

In response to the article about "real cowboys shoot duelist"...

 

No, they don't.

 

Sincerely.

[Guest Paniolo Cowboy SASS #75875]

Sounds to me like you have volunteered!

 

I would but I have communication problems ever since they took my crayon away.

 

Please have a Happy New Year pard!

[Guest Paniolo Cowboy SASS #75875]

OK, here's the rebuttal letter:

 

Dear Tex:

 

In response to the article about "real cowboys shoot duelist"...

 

No, they don't.

 

Sincerely.

 

J-Bar my friend,

 

I like it. It's short and to the point.

 

I hope you and yours have a very Happy New Year pard!

 

Semper Fi!

 

[J-BAR #18287]

J-Bar my friend,

 

I like it. It's short and to the point.

 

I hope you and yours have a very Happy New Year pard!

 

Semper Fi!

 

 

 

Thank you. I think I gave the original article all the time it deserved!

 

 

...and may I return the wishes for a safe, happy, and most prosperous New Year.

[Lone Dog, SASS #20401]

Et tu brute? PC it pains me deeply that you have thrown in with those calling me a spelling nazi. I thot we were better than that. If I really were I'da been all over some of your gems like a duck on a junebug.

 

Sorry for that hijack and that you took umbrage and for this above hi-jack.

 

Back to the topic: it is not an article in the CC, it is a letter to the editor. BIG difference. Two, it is obviously SATIRE and satire needs no response.

 

Cheeeese and Oy!!!

[Guest Paniolo Cowboy SASS #75875]

Et tu brute? PC it pains me deeply that you have thrown in with those calling me a spelling nazi. I thot we were better than that. If I really were I'da been all over some of your gems like a duck on a junebug.

 

Sorry for that hijack and that you took umbrage and for this above hi-jack.

 

Back to the topic: it is not an article in the CC, it is a letter to the editor. BIG difference. Two, it is obviously SATIRE and satire needs no response.

 

Cheeeese and Oy!!!

 

It's all tongue and cheek pard!

 

Have a Happy New Year!

 

[Anvil Al #59168]

Hope someone does.

And gives a list of all the folks wanting to take him up on his challenge.

Then we can see if he could back up ANYTHING he wrote.

 

I would like to. But I am not a good enough word smith to do it justice.

[Max Montana, SASS #23907]

Ahm not writin' a re-buttal. AFter all he makes a good point. Expresses it well.

[Guest Paniolo Cowboy SASS #75875]

Hope someone does.

And gives a list of all the folks wanting to take him up on his challenge.

Then we can see if he could back up ANYTHING he wrote.

 

I would like to. But I am not a good enough word smith to do it justice.

 

Me neither! But like you, I hope someone does.

 

[Gold Canyon Kid #43974]

Et tu brute? PC it pains me deeply that you have thrown in with those calling me a spelling nazi. I thot we were better than that. If I really were I'da been all over some of your gems like a duck on a junebug.

 

Sorry for that hijack and that you took umbrage and for this above hi-jack.

 

Back to the topic: it is not an article in the CC, it is a letter to the editor. BIG difference. Two, it is obviously SATIRE and satire needs no response.

 

Cheeeese and Oy!!!

Call it whatever you want, but every single thing that gets printed in the CC carries Tex's approval as editor for the CC. It is still very appropriate to write a rebuttal!

P. S. you do have a spelling fetish.

[Grizzly Dave]

If you all read Tex's own column, he's no stranger from writing things his own self that seem to be intended to, "stimulate conversation" shall we say.

[Guest Paniolo Cowboy SASS #75875]

Ahm not writin' a re-buttal. AFter all he makes a good point. Expresses it well.

 

A good point?

 

What point would that be?

 

Insulting other shooters, not respecting how others play the game, or looking at anyone unlike himself as "limp wristed"?

[Lone Dog, SASS #20401]

Call it whatever you want, but every single thing that gets printed in the CC carries Tex's approval as editor for the CC. It is still very appropriate to write a rebuttal!

P. S. you do have a spelling fetish.

 

Don't neether! Nyaah!

[Dee Mak Jack, SASS #55905]

I can't believe that some of you cowboys have such a thin skin and cannot take a few comments (tonge in cheek) about your style of shooting. I shoot duelist because I have a bad thumb on my other hand or I'd be shooting gunfighter. To me its not how you shoot or what you shoot just have a good time and enjoy. So, relax, calm down, and don't sweat the small stuff.

[Colorado Coffinmaker]

I see no good reason to legitimize a troll. Besides, I shoot dualist ....... just with a gun in each hand.

 

Gunfighters ROCK!!

 

Coffinmaker