G. P. Cobb Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Will the WB rules allow the new Wilson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrison Joe, SASS #60708 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 This piece will meet WB Modern requirements, I'm pretty sure. Although the muzzle cuts MIGHT be interpreted as a non-allowed external modification. It would not seem to offer a speed advantage, but, it sure is not what JMB designed in 1911. Will not fly in Traditional on several counts. You will need to use other magazines than standard Wilson units, since those all have plastic extended base plates. Here's the WB rules - http://sassnet.com/Downloads/RO/SASSWBHand..._2010_final.pdf again, in case you have lost them. Not a very intriguing piece when there are lots of other fish in the sea. Good luck, GJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Fill 'Em 67797 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Looks too much like a Hi-Power. And for $3995? No thanks, I'll stick with my Gubment Model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLACKFOOT SASS #11947 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 May be legal for modern cagegory but for 4 grand, no thanks!! Four big ones will buy one he%&a lot of good guns. Blackfoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frederick Jackson Turner Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Wow! - Nice looking pistol. A mite rich for my blood, but it looks great, and I'm a big Wilson fan. If you have the money, grab it! And shoot it in modern... ;-) and EVERYwhere else. Cheers, FJT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G. P. Cobb Posted December 28, 2010 Author Share Posted December 28, 2010 10-4 on the high price! Conversely, when the sweepstakes comes in................ and it's on it's way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.