Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Hi Folks, Discussions about the TG voting process and results come up every year. How about participating in an unofficial poll? Maybe we can get it to be a discussion item at the Regionals and above this year. Please keep to the topic and leave the ad hominem (attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument) comments out of it. Reply with which of the following you would prefer to have as a method of determining how TGs voted on rule changes. 1. No Change. 2. Publish names of TGs/Proxies who voted and their club name(s). 3. Publish names of TGs who did not vote and their club name(s). 4. Publish names of TGs/Proxies who voted, how they voted and their club name(s). 5. Publish names of all SASS affiliated clubs, who voted for them or "none," and how the person voted on each item or leave blank if no vote was submitted. 6. Publish names of clubs that voted and how they voted. (No names.) 7. Rude comment. Failure to follow instructions. Vote not counted even if gave one. I would like to see number 4 take place as I believe it would remove some of the venom that is directed at the TGs as a group and place the blame where it belongs, with those who did not vote and those who did not vote their clubs' wishes. Thanks, Allie Mo Edit to add number 5. Edit to add number 6 and word "proxies" after TG if voting. Edit to add number 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalton Masterson, SASS #51139 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greeenriver SASS #38681 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4, for the same reasons as Miss Allie. And #3, so the clubs could see who needs to be replaced. Greeenriver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steeldust Dan, SASS #2631Life Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4 I'd like to see the voting listed by Club. Really doesn't matter to me who the specific TG is. That person is a representative of the Club. Maybe something like this: Yes No Present, Not Voting Abstain (which would be for the clubs who did not have a TG in attendance nor sent a proxy SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Jack, SASS #77862 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I'd go #4, with a note of what proxies they voted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt. Morgan Rum, SASS #6859 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I'm OK with either #2 or #4 (either one would include any PROXY voting that took place) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Masked Man Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #3 AND #4. Publish names of all TGs eligible to vote, their club names, and "yea"' "nay" "abstain" or "absent". This is the most informative combo of options and eliminates any wondering if a club member doesn't know the TGs name, for example - and nothing to infer from a TG or Club name that's missing from the report. Proxies should be indicated by some notation - if a club's TG is voting by proxy, that too counts as voting. I mean, if we're going to bother with it, let's be thorough! And one more thing - THANK YOU ALLIE MO for trying to help something constructive to arise from the moaning and bellyaching about this year's voting! YOU ARE THE BEST!!!! I don't know what we'd do without ya, but here's hoping we'll never have to find out! Hi-Yo and Awaaaaaaaay, That Masked Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap Roundtree,#6056 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Hello Allie, #4 and I go along with what Mad Dog Jack said. Cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I'd go #4, with a note of what proxies they voted. The proxies would be listed under the varying club(s) names in number 4. Dan, I thought that club members would want to know who had their proxies, whether it was sent with an individual or Hipshot (who votes the emails that do not assign the proxy to another person). Triple E, I'm not sure that a list of what clubs did not vote would be needed. If your club isn't listed, you'd have that answer. Masked, that would be okay with me, however it would take a bit of space ($$$) if it were in the Chronicle. I will edit to add No. 5. Regards, Allie Mo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadlee Headlee SASS 54317 L Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4 This will protect those of us who try to do it right... FYI to do it right this year I published the agenda on our web site and provided for a vote by email for those who wanted too and got 4 total votes, had a public discussion Q&A and vote on the items at our November shoot, posted the vote results on the web page, registered my proxy with SASS as required, sent my proxy to a trusted TG that was attending the convention that I know voted the way that my club asked. This is not a small amount of work folks... It is very sad though to see so many people not happy with their TG representation. -Deadlee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingers McGee Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Number 4 sounds good to me Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 Hey Folks, This is really that TGs are posting that they want publication of how they voted. It is a start of a rebuttal to those who doubt our integrity. Keep 'em coming! Thanks, Allie Mo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Masked Man Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 It is very sad though to see so many people not happy with their TG representation. Funny thing about this whole flap is, I haven't seen where anyone has said they're not happy with their TG! I'm certainly happy with mine. Someone was upset about the outcome of the voting and wanted to know who voted how. I'm not even sure that's a good idea because it may open TGs up to harassment over how they vote, club wishes one way or another notwithstanding. If we are going to make the voting 'open' by publishing the votes - which again, I'm not sure is a good idea - we should do so in a way that gives a complete picture of how the voting went, absentees and abstentions included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madd Mike #8595 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 why dont shooters just ask their TG, how they voted and why what am I missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Canyon Kid #43974 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 So where is the option for a club that had another officer represent the club since the TG could not attend? Looks kinda like a survey about your congressman. Congress stinks but not mine. Grow up folks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivory Jack, #8534 LTG Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4 works just fine for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooting Bull Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Miss Allie, would you get upset if I offered another option? (I hope not 'cause I'm gonna do it anyway. #5 List the names of all the clubs that cast votes and how they voted. This option doesn't list any individual person's name. I don't like seeing people's names in things like this, i just too ripe for abuse. If the TG didn't cast the same vote that his club wanted him to,that's between the club and the TG. It's nobody else's business. They can handle it howver works best for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long Branch Louie Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4, but don't have a problem with our TG.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolina Cowboy Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Miss Allie, would you get upset if I offered another option? (I hope not 'cause I'm gonna do it anyway. #5 List the names of all the clubs that cast votes and how they voted. This option doesn't list any individual person's name. I don't like seeing people's names in things like this, i just too ripe for abuse. If the TG didn't cast the same vote that his club wanted him to,that's between the club and the TG. It's nobody else's business. They can handle it howver works best for them. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steeldust Dan, SASS #2631Life Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Miss Allie, would you get upset if I offered another option? (I hope not 'cause I'm gonna do it anyway. #5 List the names of all the clubs that cast votes and how they voted. This option doesn't list any individual person's name. I don't like seeing people's names in things like this, i just too ripe for abuse. If the TG didn't cast the same vote that his club wanted him to,that's between the club and the TG. It's nobody else's business. They can handle it howver works best for them. Philly, That was my point, too. I believe this latest "controversy" over the TG Summit is really about the voting results and not how individual TGs voted. A 2/3 majority vote is fairly difficult to obtain. On the national level, think about how many Presidential vetoes get overturned by the US Congress--not all that many. SD P.S. Allie: I like this thread. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetwater Jack SASS28885L Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 #4 Works just fine for me. I carried FOUR proxies and each club T/G giving me their proxy ALSO gave me a sheet showing how their CLUB wanted me to vote. I did just that. If there had been any major changes to the wording or intent of any of the issues, I would have called the other club T/Gs and consulted with them about their club's desires. As it was, that was not necessary this year. Sweetwater Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkey Creek Red, SASS # 22854 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Allie, #4 works for me as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 Miss Allie, would you get upset if I offered another option? (I hope not 'cause I'm gonna do it anyway. #5 List the names of all the clubs that cast votes and how they voted. This option doesn't list any individual person's name. I don't like seeing people's names in things like this, i just too ripe for abuse. If the TG didn't cast the same vote that his club wanted him to,that's between the club and the TG. It's nobody else's business. They can handle it howver works best for them. Hi Pard, Will do! I added a No. 5, so this will be No. 6 Also, look for another edit after the TG. Regards, Allie Mo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Ray Hality, SASS# 37355 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I would say no change needed. While I have not traveled far and wide to many many clubs, I have gotten around a little and I shoot monthly matches mainly at one gun club. I have not heard any complaining about how votes were cast, nor do I hear complaints about TGs, even at clubs I visit. The only complaining I know of is pretty much here on the wire. I can only conclude that exposing how the TG's voted is a waste of time and will not lead to less complaining. Afterall, it IS the wire. So FWIW, that was my 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I'm OK with either #2 or #4(either one would include any PROXY voting that took place) Hi Capt., Please pick one. One vote per person. I'm making a spreadsheet (sometimes I miss work ) Regards, Allie Mo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabez Cowboy,SASS # 50129 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I like My TG (don't tell him that) and I talk to him ..... But I'm fine with #4 ... Jabez Cowboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steeldust Dan, SASS #2631Life Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 See below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 Dan and Philly, I'll put you down for number 6. Virgil, I can happily agree with you on most things you posted. I'm only keeping track of names so that I know who voted and who changed their mind. If I take this any farther, no names will be used. So, send me a PM or email if you wish anonomity on this thread but would like to be counted. Thanks! Allie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steeldust Dan, SASS #2631Life Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Dan and Philly, I'll put you down for number 6. Virgil, I can happily agree with you on most things you posted. I'm only keeping track of names so that I know who voted and who changed their mind. If I take this any farther, no names will be used. So, send me a PM or email if you wish anonomity on this thread but would like to be counted. Thanks! Allie You are correct again, 6 it is. SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blastmaster Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I vote for option #1. I like all the TG's of the clubs I belong to. I have no reason to believe they voted any other way that what the majority of the club members told him how they wanted it. I don't know or care how Club BR-549 voted way-over/far-away voted. Blastmaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checotah Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I'm fine with #4, as contrasted with Old #4. I have no problem with anyone/everyone knowing how I voted on behalf of my club. And I have full faith in Sweetwater Jack who took my proxy; I'm sure he voted either as directed or as necessary for the best interest of our club if changes or clarifications surfaced. I really don't understand all the dissatisfaction with the TG's. All the ones I know vote their clubs' decisions and have the best interests of the game at heart. But I'm in full support of tossing out any who don't fulfill the obligations of the job, the most important of which surrounds the TG Agenda items and the resulting voting process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Gregg Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Allie: Reckon I'm for #4 too. But my favorite drink is Ol' #7. Mustang Gregg [TGing for 2 NE clubs] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Masked Man Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Guess I'll have to change my vote to #6 now that we have a couple of new options. Thanks again Allie for sewing us up a silk purse from that...uh...thing we had before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooting Bull Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Dan and Philly, I'll put you down for number 6. Virgil, I can happily agree with you on most things you posted. I'm only keeping track of names so that I know who voted and who changed their mind. If I take this any farther, no names will be used. So, send me a PM or email if you wish anonomity on this thread but would like to be counted. Thanks! Allie No no, don't do that. I was just offering it as an option. I'm sending my actual vote in via proxy. Madd Mike will be brining it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty-Nine Cent Wizard Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Count me in for #4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.