Dilli GaHoot Galoot

You might look into theater set design, the concept is the same, or maybe one of your local schools or community theaters might have some folks that could help out

Smoking deal! These are great and use the same action as the 'full size' CZ rifles, so you can upgrade the stock and barrel almost as easily as you can a 10/22. Great rifle and excellent price

lolz, "current" This one first ran back in 1995, but to your question, I don't think there is a universal answer if the older kids would blame her, it would relly depend on the family On a side note, the line "I've seen the sunset thousands of times, too." from that comic lives on in my house!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_tobacco#:~:text=In 1996%2C Sheikh Ahmed Bin,%2C" to justify his ruling. Oman[edit] In 1996, Sheikh Ahmed Bin Hamad Al Khalili, the Grand Mufti of Oman, issued a fatwa prohibiting smoking and the sale of tobacco, comparing smoking to "sipping poison" Sheikh Al Khalili cited a verse from the Quran,[8] "do not kill yourselves for God Almighty is most merciful to you," to justify his ruling.[4]

As I recall it was a regular blank, but the pistol was up against his head so the cardboard wad was still lethal

Yeah, and after that the gun went to her, she 'made it ready' for the scene per the shot list, then gave it to Hall who took it to Baldwin. Even if the gun was used for live shooting (related to the production or not) at any point in time, it was Gutierrez-Reed's responsibility to make sure it was safe before it went on set I'm confused, do you think someone intentionally put live rounds in there so the cinematographer would be shot?

As I understand it, Gutierrez-Reed purchased and the brought the ammo on set, she loaded the gun and handed it to Hall telling him it was cold or loaded with blanks or whatever. I don't recall a single person involved that has suggested any other chain of events

Gutierrez-Reed bought ammo that matched what was in the gun and she is the one that loaded the gun. There is no one else to look for. And she did it because she was criminally incompetent at her job, something The Producer had been made aware of and chose to do nothing about

The Armorer is because it was her job to insure firearms were handled safely The Producer is because it was his job to hire people qualified to do their job and to replace them when they are not able to do the job they were hired for, especially when 'the job' is to keep everyone on set safe SAG on firearms hadaling https://www.sagaftra.org/sag-aftra-statement-regarding-new-charges-rust-tragedy#:~:text=An actor's job is not,accurate operation of that firearm.

SAG rules for handling firearms on set prohibit actors from checking the firearm and on set they are not to be handed a 'real firearm'. If you have a qualified armorer, that never happens. The charges must have everything to do with what you believe to be semantics if you want a convection you have to show that the "person" on trial violated the rules in a way that lead to a death. The Actor Baldwin did what actors are supposed to do, the only way to hold him accountable is to show that as The Producer he failed in his responsibility which he clearly did. I would also like them to look at why he chose NM and why he hired Gutierrez-Reed, if it these choices were specifically to save money and skirt around other laws by bullying inexperienced staff I believe that should be considered in the sentencing

And the cinematographer would not have been there! serious question: Is it more important to you (or anyone else) how he is held accountable or just that he in some way is held accountable? The SAG guidelines for handling firearms on set will pretty much ruin any chance of him being held accountable as The Finger that pulled the trigger, but those same guidelines and the laws of NM can and should be used to hold him accountable as The Producer that created the circumstances that predictably led to that gun being in his hand and everything else that went wrong on the set

This! If the prosecutor goes after The Actor they will likely lose, but the same arguments that they successfully used against the armorer and her duties also apply to the The Producer

I love the trim job you did on it! That took away all the "advertising slogan" vibe that it had before and made it much more personal

Maybe something here https://www.vintagegunscopes.com/26mm30mm-tubes